Eco Landuse Systems Logo

Research and expertise in organic agriculture

 

A. Farm Production

B. Marketing and Trade

C. Environment

D. Research Policy  

Click on these areas to see more details. Each area contains links to a list of relevant publications. In most cases abstracts, summaries or full papers can be found.


A. Farm Production

Agricultural production, together with marketing, determines returns to farming. In the 1980, there was little understanding of production methods employed by organic farmers. Explainations of what organic agricuture is, and how it differs from conventional production, and its status in Australia in the 1980s were provided in the first Discussion Paper by The National Associations for Sustainable Agriculture, Australia (NASAA), published in 1987(A1).

Changes in production methods affect farmers, environment and also the whole industry or country. Farmers who have moved towards organic agriculture were interviewed, their problems and possibilities highlighted, and lessons learned from their experiences (A4 and A18). The effect of a change in pesticide use due to a change in technology - such as an increased adoption of minimum tillage practices (A10) - was examined. The history of the development of organic agriculture in Australia was described in A24.

On the international scene, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization became interested in a potential contribution of organic agriculture to sustainability goals, and commissioned a paper (A12) to be discussed in its Committee on Agriculture in 1999.

Analysis of farm production is of interest to policy makers, input suppliers, researchers and others who want to know the state of the industry, trends in the use of new methods, implications of changes towards new methods, etc. The main analysis of net benefits to cereal/ livestock (A2, A7, A9 and A17) and dairy (A8 and A19) farming in Australia was carried out through farm surveys. For developing countries, and in particular for the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, this with done through literature reviews (A12 and A13). Research results were prepared for policy considerations and extension purposes, and used in conferences and published in farm magazines (A5, A6, A15) and for other media, such as radio and tv. A summary paper on the situation in cereal-livestock farming, for established organic farmers and farmers in conversion, was presented at workshops for farmers, and has been included here (A16). An overview chapter on the economics of organic agriculture in Australia and world wide was also published (A22).

Further work for policy considerations included the developement of models to estimate the effect of adoption of organic management methods. This was done both for the Australian (A11) and Danish economy (A14) on both the level of a typical farm and the farm sector.

When discussing farm profitability, it is difficult to seperate out farm productivity and marketing opportunities. An analysis of specific commodity (including production and marketing) was undertaken for grain - in particular barley (A20), and beef (A23). In the international market, comparative production costs are of importance (A21).

On the international scene, we analysed problems that producers face in a general way (A18), and more specifically in developing countries (A13).

Most recently, in the Australian context, the emphasis has been on data gathering and analysis, both at a regional (A25) and national level (A26 and A27).

Back to top


B. Marketing and Trade

Marketing is an important factor in farmers' returns. Developing a market for special products such as organic food involves not only coordinating the various marketing functions, but also requires a regulatory framework to assure consumers that particular standards are being met. This includes establishing a set of standards and a monitoring and compliance structure to ensure that the standards are met. Some role for government is inevitable, and negotiation with government is required before an adequately functioning market can be achieved. Before this interaction can take place, the nitty-gritty of such a scheme, with explanations about the different activities required and the cost-structure, needs to be available for scrutiny ( B2). For Australia, the process related to standards, certification and auditing of organic products is described and analysed for the past, present and future in (B18).

Apart from involvement in the practical aspects of marketing, analysis of marketing policies is of interest to politicians and policy advisers, farmers' organisations, and traders of agricultural products, both wholesale and retail. Australian policies regarding the marketing of organic wheat were analysed in the late 1980s and found at the time to adversely affect the marketing of the product (B1).

Producers in Australia are rather dependent on export markets. In the setting-up period of marketing a new product marketing, as marketing of organic products is (B3), there is a need for producers to inform themselves about the practical side of where to sell produce and the rules and regulations concerning other countries' imports (B4 and B5).

Policies regarding organic agriculture are best made on the basis of knowledge about marketing. Eco Landuse Systems was part of a team which mapped marketing arrangements of organic agricultural products in the European Union and some other European countries (B7).

Organic agriculture is a topic of increasing interest to the UN. For the UN's Food and Agricultual Organization (FAO), past, present and future trends in certified organic production and trade flows were analysed in a chapter that was part of a comprehensive report on organic agriculture (B12). For UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) we edited a book on trade between developing and developed countries in organically-grown products (B13). Another report for UNCTAD/FAO and the International Federation for Organic Movements (IFOAM) analysed the potential gains from harmonising organic standards across countries. A quantitative analysis was applied to wheat and coffee (B14 and B15), and a paper phocussing on Australia's part in these issues published (B17).

Some issues stradle both trade and environment, such as the minimisation of resource use (e.g. use of compost as an input), genetic engineering, and multi-functionality.

The development of the compost market could well contribute to the ease with which organic agriculture can be taken up by producers. The possibilities of such a development were examined
(B6).

The production of genetically modified crops has implications for both trade and environment. Producers need to decide whether the perceived competitive advantages of producing crops more efficiently is real, and if so, whether it outweighs the potential negative environmental effects and possible lack of acceptance by consumers in some countries. Both issues, implications for international trade and uncertainties regarding the environmental effects, should make policy makers cautious in adopting the new technologies (B8).

Multi-functionality is a concept used to justify subsidies to farmers for functions of farming other than agricultural production, such as landscape management. Two papers explore issues relevant to international trade and environment (B10-B11).

International trade is seen by many to be in conflict with the environment, but this need not be the case. By lowering the global costs of production, international trade can reduce the use of resources. However, an aversion for international trade is discernable in some quarters of those involved in organic agriculture. Consumers of organic products commonly espouse the consumption of locally produced goods, based on environmental and energy concerns. The positive effect on the environment of international trade was explored (B9), as well as the negative effects of the fashionable 'food-miles' concept (B19).

Data are always in short supply in organic agriculture. The International Trade Centre (ITC) in Geneva required an appraisal of what kind of data are needed to assist trade by developing countries in organic products (B16). Internationally, efforts are made to publish statistics on organic agriculture world-wide annually (B20-B21).Data relevant to Australia are discussed under the 'Farm Production' section of this website (A25-A26).

Back to top


C. Environment

The effect of the agricultural production system on the off-farm environment are of interest not only to the farmer, but also to others who bear costs in terms of diminished amenities (such as water quality) or clean-up costs. Consumers of agricultural products may be interested in a comparison of the systems to determine their consumption preferences. Environmentalists and policy makers could also be interested in off-farm costs and benefits listed and discussed ( C1).

Some European countries have been in the forefront of developing policies to reduce the risk from inputs used in conventional agriculture, and in particular risks related to pesticide use. Reports analyse the different policies in The Netherlands ( C5), Sweden ( C6) and Denmark ( C7). A summary was published in the media (C3) - food for thought for Australia( C4)?

The production of genetically modified crops has implications for both trade and environment. Producers need to decide whether the perceived competitive advantages of producing crops more efficiently is real, and if so, whether it outweighs the potential negative environmental effects and possible lack of acceptance by consumers in some countries. Both issues, implications for international trade and uncertainties regarding the environmental effects should make policy makers cautious in adopting the new technologies (C10). The Organic Federation of Australia published a Position Paper on how genetic engineering is treated in organic standards (C13)

Multi-functionality is a concept used to justify subsidies to farmers for functions of farming other than agricultural production, such as the environment or landscape management. Two papers explore issues related to this concept (B10 and B11).

Some work was carried out on issues other than agriculture. One issue was municipal waste management, the other the tree replacement program in the ACT (C14). In connection with waste management, the first report details the situation in the ACT (C8), the other in NSW (C9).

Soil degradation is threatening an important input for farmers all over the world. Many feel that there is a need for creating an international focus on soil problems. There has been a prolonged public debate concerning the establishment of a UN Soil Convention. A report, commissioned by the Danish National Association for Organic Agriculture explores the feasibility and advisability of such an institution, and concludes that a UN Convention is not the right vehicle for progress (C11). 

International trade is seen by many to be in conflict with the environment, but this need not be the case. By lowering the global costs of production, trade can reduce the use of resources. However, trade barriers remain a means of limiting environmentally degrading production processes occuring in other countries. An aversion for international trade is discernable in some quarters of those involved in organic agriculture. Consumers of organic products commonly espouse the consumption of locally produced goods, based on environmental and energy concerns. However, buying locally produced goods may be detrimental to the environment. The positive effect on the environment of international trade is explored (C12).

Back to top


D. Research Policy  

Much has been written about determining priorities in research, but if there is a paradigm shift, rules change. After an analysis of a change in technology which is argued to be a paradigm shift, resulting research needs in general are discussed ( D1), and in particular for Australian conditions (D2). The state of affairs on research in organic farming methods is examined for Europe (FAO) (D3), globally (D4) and for the world in general, with examples of European, US and Australian levels of expenditure (D5). The principles discussed in those works are then translated into the OFA's Position Paper on priorities for research and extension in organic agriculture in Australia (D7).

Producer levies for research and marketing paid by organic farmers in Australia were first estimated in a report funded by the Australian Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation in the early 2000s. Some indication is given of the magnitude of public expenditure on research in organic agriculture. The work also presents the first estimate of the size of the organic industry of Australia based on industry data (D6).

A more recent study (2019) sponsored by the National Association of Sustainable Agriculture, Australia (NASAA) was published by Organic Trust Australia - Research and Education (OTARE), and indicated a considerable increase in contributions by organic farmers to research in agriculture in the last two decades (
D11).

The availability of data in the organic industry in Australia has always been a problem. Data collected in recent years by the Australian Bureau of Statistics have been analysed, and suggestions provided for improvements in methods of analysis (
D10).

  Back to top Home page